Frame
State the decision, audience, timeframe, and required depth.
A source-disciplined workflow for converting an approved research packet into a concise decision brief with citations, uncertainty, and unresolved questions.
A readable briefing that distinguishes source facts, analysis, assumptions, and open questions—giving a decision-maker useful orientation without hiding uncertainty.
Begin with the decision context and a bounded source set. The model synthesizes what is provided; it should not silently fill gaps from unknown sources.
State the decision, audience, timeframe, and required depth.
Assemble a dated packet of trusted, reviewable material.
Extract converging facts, tensions, assumptions, and implications.
Verify citations and test the brief for omitted counterevidence.
The prompt prevents a polished narrative from disguising weak evidence.
| Section | Purpose | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Decision in view | Clarify what the reader must consider | One sentence, no hidden recommendation |
| What is established | Present supported facts | Citation attached to every material claim |
| What remains uncertain | Expose limitations and disagreement | No invented resolution |
| Questions before action | Focus further diligence | Owned and answerable |
The output states which materials were included and what was outside scope.
A human reviewer opens each source and confirms that it supports the claim.
Conflicts, gaps, and assumptions remain explicit in the final brief.
Illustrative concept content only. Users remain responsible for source quality, verification, decisions, and compliance with applicable requirements.